Categories
Opinion

Deep Waters

The thing about blogging, if that’s what I’m doing, is that I have to do it in the middle of the day. I can’t save it for later. And that’s a lot of why I haven’t done it that much, I don’t always hang onto things that I want to talk about in this medium. But I’ve got a bit of time and something on my mind so let’s talk.

If you’ve followed me on social media for a while, and if your timeline isn’t too cluttered, you’ve probably seen me doing a thread on an argument before. Not an argument thread, but a thread about an argument which is taking place somewhere else. It’s typically me breaking down how I think things went, devices I think worked, when people overextended, etc. A kind of post-game report.

If you don’t really know me, you might assume that what I’m doing is gloating, and there’s a little bit of that. But these aren’t like popular threads and I don’t do them with the expectation that other people are going to be interested. That’s why you will very rarely see me do that other popular move: arguing by quote tweeting. If I quote tweet it’s generally because someone has said something particularly absurd to where I’m not even taking it seriously. Much more often, you’ll see the other person quote tweet and then I’ll follow them with a regular reply. I don’t need an audience, though I don’t reject one; my arguing style is not sneaky, so there’s nothing to hide.

Categories
Opinion

Anti-Intellectualism on the Left

I just want to write about a trend that I have noticed on the “online left”, one which is probably common through all of the history of leftism, socialism, communism, anarchism, etc., but which is really striking me recently. I don’t know how long I will write but I need to put this into a space which is different than the one where I usually talk, and maybe having to slow down will help me come to more useful thoughts.

The trend I’ve noticed is anti-intellectualism. I could be specific and say “anti-academia” because that is how it usually manifests, but I believe that it is just garden variety anti-intellectualism.

Categories
Opinion

Religion in TTRPG Fantasy

I recently watched a video that I’d had on my watch later for a while, so we’re here to talk about religion in fantasy worlds. Well, specifically, religion in fantasy roleplaying games which involve interacting with the gods. Seems like I’m narrowing it pretty hard off the bat, but it’s necessary. See, the video I watched was “Do Fantasy Pantheons Make Sense?” by the YouTube channel The Grungeon Master, and he says that this is common across all fantasy. I’m not sure that’s true. It is common in D&D, however, and in many other fantasy RPG settings that take tropes from D&D, so I want to talk about this in terms of worldbuilding.

There’s a lot that I agree with The Grungeon Master on, and the video articulated a feeling that I don’t think I’ve done a good job putting across before. Specifically, why is it that D&D-style polytheism feels so alien to people who have studied ancient polytheism like that of Greece or the Norse countries, or who are affiliated with modern polytheism like in Hinduism or various folk, regional, and new religions. Grungeon lays out several points (not in this manner, I’m paraphrasing here) which I think are important to fleshing out the dissonant feeling that tabletop polytheism gives.

Categories
Opinion

Pro-Wres Lab: Damage and Vulnerability

Let’s talk for a little bit about how pro wrestling matches themselves can be different. I’m talking about more than just skin-deep; I want to talk about the bones. If you watch WWE, AEW, NJPW, and UWFi (from back in the day) one after another, you’ll see that they’re all presented with significant differences, but they all move in a way that has basic similarities. There’s an underlying assumption that everyone shares about wrestling. This is what I call the “match theory”. This article is going to explain what I think the common match theory is, then I’m going to introduce my own match theory: vulnerability theory.

Categories
Opinion

Pro-Wres Lab: The Agency System, Part 1 (feat. AEW)

Let’s try and rethink wrestling. It’s an ambitious proposition, I get it, but I’ll have fun with it and maybe you will, too. What I’m going to do is propose a new style of wrestling booking: the Agency System. If I had to boil down the goal of the Agency System to one word, it would be realism. If I had a few more, I’d say this: we’re going to rely on naturalistic stories for wrestling rather than on artificial stories.

American pro wrestling is for children. When I say this, I don’t say it disparagingly as-such. That is, I’m not saying “American pro wrestling is for children and therefore bad, because children only like bad things”. What I’m saying is compare the beats of The Sopranos to the beats of Power Rangers (look, I’m not watching TV these days, work with me) and see what pro wrestling hews closer to1. Not just WWE. All of American TV pro wrestling is like this. It is loud, it is in your face, it is frantic. It’s almost desperate not to lose your attention.

Categories
Opinion

Stancil and Theory

I gotta get back to blogging instead of doing long tweet threads (@nearzone.bsky.social). I also gotta get better at transferring threads to the blog so they’re not quite so obtrusive. Maybe I’ll set myself reminders.

Anyway, here are tweets about Will Stancil and my theory (which you can check out on Journal of Cogency). I do want to try to keep politics off of this blog for the most part (and I swear I’ll try to do a light thing soon, been working) but it’s a series of tweets so it’s better for the silly blog.

Categories
Lit

Parts

I am like a billy goat
Whose horns are old
In a moldy coat
I will not shear a single hair
For I am not of Theseus or Jason
With rheumy eyes I watch the woman on the screen
And tremble

Categories
Opinion

Review: AEW Dynamite 1/1/25 – Look I Know It’s Late

I’m not gonna bother finding an image or anything for this one, but I’d still encourage you to read it. I both review Dynamite and give a commentary on the Thursday Dynamite Review from the VoW Flagship Patreon. I’m also going to start giving “enjoyment grades” to segments, using the common American grading scale (A, B, C, D, F), with C being average or moderate enjoyment. Like with the stars, I’m going to avoid “adjustments”, so there’ll be few C+s or A-s. Also in this one, I really went for a blow-by-blow type of recording, as best I can. I lost steam near the end. It wasn’t a great show.

Categories
Opinion

Commentary: Instant Reaction Live – AEW World’s End 2024

And here’s my commentary for the last AEW PPV of 2024, AEW World’s End! Happy New Year everybody, as I’ve said I’ve fallen behind a bit on my AEW watching but I’m catching up here. Here’s my reactions to the Voices of Wrestling Flagship podcast’s Instant Reaction Live to the show. This has a lot of talk about stakes, which is one of the Big Ideas that I’ve been working with when writing about wrestling.

Categories
Opinion

Philosophy: What Is Attention?

Attention has always interested me as a subject of thinking, but as a non-psychologist, it’s been difficult for me to get stuck into the study of it. I can search, of course, but it’s not a huge topic when I do so. Instead, what I’m going to do here is a bias, which is a form I use to put forward my personal theory about an idea. From there, when I decide to pick up this line of thought again, I’ll have specific avenues existing already that I want to move forward with. I expect that a lot of my presumptions will be ripped apart when I look into them further; that’s the nature of honest research. I’ve had my own thoughts and done some preliminary reading on the subject. That said, I will be leaving this largely unsourced so that I don’t give off the idea that these are final conclusions.